The Claude Certified Developer – Foundations (CCDV-F) exam validates that you can build and ship production applications with Claude — not just design them on a whiteboard. Where the Architect track (CCA-F / CCAR-P) tests architectural judgment, CCDV-F tests whether you can actually wire up the Claude API, reason about tool-use and context correctly, debug a failing integration, and ship it with basic security and evaluation discipline in place.
This guide frames the exam and links out to a deep-dive for each of the eight domains. It's an independent, unofficial resource — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by Anthropic, and it reproduces no real exam items.
One important note on freshness: CCDV-F is brand new — the official exam guide is version 1.0, effective July 2026, its first published revision. Treat the mechanics below as verified against that document as of August 2026, and always confirm specifics (fee, eligibility, current domain weights) against Anthropic's official exam page before you book, since a young exam is the most likely to see a v1.1 revision.
What CCDV-F is — and who it's for
CCDV-F targets AI/ML engineers, technical leads, and senior software engineers who build and ship Claude-powered applications. Anthropic's own candidate profile recommends 1–5 years of software engineering experience, 6+ months of hands-on work with Claude or a comparable LLM, and working proficiency in Python and/or TypeScript, REST APIs, and the command line. There is no mandatory prerequisite — you don't need CCA-F first — but the exam explicitly assumes you can already write and ship code; it is not aimed at non-technical or prompt-only roles.
Exam mechanics
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Exam code | CCDV-F (Anthropic's blog also uses "Claude Certified Developer: Foundations" — same exam) |
| Format | 53 items · multiple-choice + multiple-response (each item states how many to select) · 120 minutes |
| Passing score | 720 (scaled 100–1000, criterion-referenced — not curved against other candidates) |
| Fee | $125 USD |
| Delivery | Proctored — Pearson VUE OnVUE online or an in-person test center |
| Validity | 12 months → free non-proctored renewal if renewed on time, otherwise a full retake at full fee |
| Retakes | 14-day wait after a 1st fail, 30 days after a 2nd, 90 days after a 3rd — max 4 attempts per rolling 12 months |
The eight domains at a glance
The blueprint spans eight weighted domains, and the spread is lopsided: Applications & Integration alone is a third of the exam. Study time should follow the weighting, not an even split across eight equally-sized buckets.
| Domain | Weight | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| V2 — Applications and Integration | 33.1% | Claude API mechanics, software-engineering fundamentals, application design, configuration management |
| V5 — Model Selection and Optimization | 16.8% | LLM fundamentals, model tradeoffs (Opus/Sonnet/Haiku), token and cost management, prompt caching |
| V1 — Agents and Workflows | 14.7% | Workflow vs. agent architecture, Agent SDK, agent patterns and frameworks |
| V6 — Prompt and Context Engineering | 11.0% | Context-window management, instruction/prompt design, structured output handling |
| V8 — Tools and MCPs | 10.6% | Tool/function-calling implementation, MCP server development, built-in vs. custom tools vs. Skills |
| V7 — Security and Safety | 8.1% | Prompt-injection and jailbreak defense, guardrails, Claude hooks, secrets/key management |
| V3 — Claude Code | 3.1% | CLAUDE.md, Rules/Skills/Commands/Agents, session management, headless and auto-mode operation |
| V4 — Eval, Testing, and Debugging | 2.6% | Error-type identification, recovery strategy, isolating integration-layer vs. model-output failures |
If you've already studied CCA-F, here's what carries over
- Reused across both: the agentic-loop mental model (workflow vs. agent), MCP's tool/resource/prompt primitives,
tool_use/tool_resultmechanics, and the deterministic-enforcement-vs-prompting distinction for security all show up on both exams — CCDV-F just weights the implementation details (exact JSON Schema shape, retry/idempotency behavior, SDK usage) more heavily than the design tradeoffs. - Largely net-new for CCDV-F: the entire Applications & Integration domain (33.1%) tests software-engineering fundamentals — REST semantics, async patterns, version control, code review, SDLC, and Claude API mechanics in implementation detail (streaming, batching,
stop_reasonvalues, error codes) — that CCA-F does not test at all. - Narrower, not absent: Claude Code and Eval/Testing/Debugging are real domains here but small ones (3.1% and 2.6% combined) — don't over-invest relative to their weight, even though they feel meaty.
A study approach
Key takeaways
- 01CCDV-F tests building and shipping Claude applications, not architecture design — implementation over judgment.
- 0253 items, 120 minutes, 720/1000 to pass, $125, eight weighted domains; Claude Partner Network eligibility (unofficial reports, confirm officially).
- 03No mandatory prerequisite, but the exam assumes real software-engineering ability, not just prompting skill.
- 04Applications & Integration (33.1%), Model Selection & Optimization (16.8%), and Agents & Workflows (14.7%) are ~65% of the exam.
- 05The biggest domain (Applications & Integration) barely overlaps with CCA-F — it's mostly net-new study even if you've passed Foundations Architect.
- 06CCDV-F is brand new (v1.0, July 2026) — confirm fee, format, and eligibility on the official page.
Common mistakes
Treating CCDV-F as "CCA-F but easier."
It's a different exam testing different skills — implementation and software-engineering fundamentals, not architectural tradeoffs. Study it fresh rather than assuming Architect prep transfers.
Spreading study time evenly across all eight domains.
Applications & Integration alone is a third of the exam. Weight your prep to match — build a real application first.
Ignoring the general software-engineering content because it feels "too basic" for a Claude-specific exam.
REST semantics, async patterns, and SDLC discipline are explicitly inside the heaviest domain — skipping them costs real points.
Frequently asked
Do I need to pass CCA-F (Architect Foundations) before CCDV-F?
No — there's no mandatory prerequisite, and the two exams test different things: CCA-F tests architectural judgment, CCDV-F tests building and shipping. You can sit either first.
How is CCDV-F different from CCA-F?
CCA-F asks whether a given design is architecturally correct. CCDV-F asks whether you can correctly implement it — Claude API mechanics, software-engineering fundamentals, debugging a failing integration — and adds a whole domain (Applications & Integration, 33.1%) that CCA-F doesn't test at all.
Is CCDV-F open to anyone?
Multiple independent sources report a Claude Partner Network eligibility gate (a company email tied to a member organization), similar to Anthropic's other role-based certifications. Confirm current eligibility on Anthropic's official page before planning around it.
Independent, unofficial study material. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by Anthropic. Every example is original and written to teach the public exam objectives — no real exam questions are reproduced. Technical details reflect Claude, the Anthropic API, Claude Code, and MCP as of August 24, 2026; always confirm specifics against current official documentation.
Test yourself
Turn what you just read into answers you can check.